Dissolution
of a firm
Dissolution
of partnership implies termination of original partnership agreement or change
in contractual relationship among partners. A partnership is dissolved due to
the insolvency, retirement, incapability, death, expulsion etc of a partner or
on the expiry/completion of the term of partnership. A partnership can be
dissolved without dissolving the firm. In this dissolution the business of firm
does not come to an end. The remaining partners can continue the business by
entering into a new agreement. On the other hand dissolution of the firm
implies dissolution between all the partners. The business of the partnership
comes to an end. Its assets are realized and its liabilities are paid off.
Dissolution of a firm always involves dissolution of a partnership but
vice-versa is not always true.
Modes of
dissolution of firm
1)
Dissolution by
agreement- A partnership may be
dissolved with the mutual consent of all the partners in accordance with the
term of the agreement
2)
Dissolution by
notice - In case of partnership at
will a firm may be dissolved if any partner gives a notice in writing to other
partners indicating his intentions to dissolve the firm. In such a case the
dissolution taken place with effect from the date mentioned in the notice. If
no date is mentioned the firm may be dissolved with effect from date of
receiver of notice by other partners and when such a notice is given to other
partners it cannot be withdrawn without their consent.
3)
Contingent
dissolution - A firm may be dissolved
on the happening of any of the following contingencies
i)
On the expiry of
the term if its for a fixed period.
ii)
On the completion
of the firm venture
iii)
On the death of a
partner
iv)
When a partner
becomes insolvent
4)
Compulsory
dissolution- A firm stands
automatically dissolved in the following cases
i)
When all partners
or all but one partner is declared insolvent
ii)
When the business
of the firm becomes unlawful due to the happenings of the event
5)
Dissolution
through court - The court may order
the dissolution of a firm in the following cases
i)
when a partner
becomes of an unsound mind
ii)
When a person
becomes permanently incapable of performing his duties as a partner
iii)
When a partner is
guilty of misconduct which is likely to effect the business of the firm
iv)
When a partner
will fully and persistently commit breach of the partnership agreement
v)
When a partner
unauthorizedly transfers the whole of his interest or share in the firm to the
third person
vi)
When the business
of the firm cannot be carried on except at a loss
vii)
When it is just
equitable that the firm should be dissolved.
Merits and
limitations
1)
Merits
a)
Ease of
formation -a partnership is easy to
form as no legal formalities are involved. an agreement is necessary and the
procedure for registration is simple. Similarly a partnership can be dissolved
easily at any time without under going any legal formalities besides
registration of a firm is not essential and partnership agreement need not
essentially in writing
b)
Larger financial
resources - As a no. of person or
partner contribute to all capital of the firm it is possible to collect larger
financial resources therefore it has a greater credit worthiness by the
partners or by any other sources. There is a greater scope for expansion or
growth of business
c)
Specialization
and balanced approach - The
partnership firm enables the pooling of abilities and judgment of several
person. Combined abilities of judgment result are more efficient management of
business. Partners with complimentary skills may be chosen to avail of the
benefits of the specialization. Judicious choice of partners with diversified
skills ensures balanced decisions.
d)
Flexibility of
operation - A partnership firm
involves sufficient flexibility in its day-to-day activities. The nature and
place of business can be changed whenever the partners desire so. The agreement
can be altered and new partners can be admitted whenever necessary.
e)
Protection of
minority interest - No basic changes
in the rights and obligation of partners can be made without unanimous consent
of all the partners.
f)
Personal
incentives and supervisions -
Partners have their interest in the business of the profit share. The share of
profit can increase depending on the efficiency and commitment of the partners.
Hence in partnership firm the partners tend to be more committed.
g)
Capacity of
survival - The survival capacity is
more therefore even if the partners dies or becomes insolvent the firm can
continue by altering the business agreement.
h)
Better human
and public relation - A partnership
has many person involved of them some must be good in human and public
relation. They represent the firm and due to their human and public relation
capability they improve the image increase creditability and brings about an
overall growth of firm.
i)
Business
Secrecy - This is also maintained in
other forms of business. Important facts
like profit sharing ratio are kept secret.
2)
Demerits
a)
Unlimited
liability - As there are many
partners and number can increase this implies capital input increase hence
liabilities increases
b)
Limited
resources - Investment of capital is
according to agreement. If a partner wants he cannot increase his capital input
without consent of others as increase from his part involves proportionate increase
in capital input from others. Moreover no. of partners involved in a
partnership has a maximum limit.
c)
Risk of
implied agency - When a partner joins
then he has to shoulder the responsibility and duties as and when necessary.
This is not mentioned it is implied.
d)
Lack of
harmony - Success of partnership
depends on mutual understanding and co-ordination. Partners come from different
background hence maintaining harmony would be a problem
e)
Lack of
continuity - Contingency factors may
cause disruption in the business. Therefore there is lack of continuity.
f)
Non-transferability
of interest - A person cannot
transfer his interest to any one nor even his family
g)
Public
district - As it is not necessary to register a
partnership firm hence these unregistered firms lack public interest These
firms have no legal entity
There
are two legal terms known as sale and agreement to sell
Contract
of sales Contract of sale is defined
as a contract where by the seller transfer or agrees to transfer the property
in goods to buyer for a price. This is as per section 5 clause 2 of the law
[Section 5(2) ].
Sale
is known as where under contract of
sale the property of good is transferred from the seller to the buyer.
Agreement
to sell where under a contract of
sale the transfer of property of good is to take place at a future time or
subject to same condition thereafter to the fulfilled is called the agreement
to sell.
Essentials
of sale
1)
Bilateral
Contract - there must be two parties’
buyers and sellers who should be two different persons.
2)
Money
consideration - this is termed, as
price consideration for a sale of good must involve money called price. Where
goods are exchanged for goods it is not sale but barter. But there is nothing
to prevent consideration being partly in money and partly in goods.
3)
Goods - The subject matter of sale must be “Goods” meaning
as per section 2 clause 7 “ Every kind
of movable property other than actionable claims and money and includes stock
and shares, growing crops, grass and attached to and forming part of the land -
which are agreed to be served before sale or under the contract of the sale.
Ø These goods include every kind of movable property as
against actionable claim and money. Things like goodwill, trademark, patents,
gas, water, etc all are goods
Ø Things attached to earth can be subject matter of
sale. Eg trees which provides on something, which is served fro the earth under
the contract.
Ø Goods include shares and stock as well money cant be
subject matter of sale. Where is foreign coins can be subject matter of sale
[dollar is sold]
4)
There must be
transfer of general as well as compared to special property. Eg if ‘a’ owns
certain goods he has general property in the goods. If ‘a’ pledges them with
‘b’ then ‘b’ has special property in them
5)
Contract of sale
must have all essential elements of a valid contract
6)
Sale and
contract of work and material -
contract of sale is different from contract involving exercise of skill of
labor
Distinction
between sale and agreement to sell
1) Transfer of property
sale has immediate effect of transferring property.
|
1) Transfer of property
In it the property is to transfer or to pass at some future time or
subject to fulfillment of some conditions
|
2) Risk
Risk passes with delivery to buyer
|
2)
Risk
Here seller remains owner $ runs all the risk.
|
3) Breach of contract by buyer
I f buyer commits default the seller may sue him for price i.e to say
for specific enforcement of contract
|
3) Breach of contract by buyer
Sellers only remedy is to sue for damages for breach.
|
4) Nature of contract
It is an executed contract
|
4) Nature of contract
It is an executor contract.
|
5)Nature of right
Makes the buyer owner of goods. He can exercise all property rights
in respect of them. He acquires a jus-in-sern- right against goods. The effect is that if
seller refuses to deliver the goods buyer may sue for recovery of goods by
specific performance.
|
5) Nature of right
It is a contract pure & simple. Buyers rights are only personal
rights against the seller. He can only sue for damages on breach $ not for
recovery of goods.
|
6) Right of resale
Seller can’t resell except in certain cases such as sale by seller in
possession after sale under section 30 or sale by unpaid seller- the buyer
does not get.
|
6) Right of resale
The subsequent buyer who buys goods in
good faith for value & without notice of prior agreement - gets a good
title
|
Comments
Post a Comment